Memorex CP8 TURBO UNIVERSAL REMOTE CONTROL Manuel d'utilisateur Page 82

  • Télécharger
  • Ajouter à mon manuel
  • Imprimer
  • Page
    / 100
  • Table des matières
  • MARQUE LIVRES
  • Noté. / 5. Basé sur avis des utilisateurs
Vue de la page 81
90
By
Joseph
J.
Carr, K4IPV
[11
ON HAM RADIO
Resurrecting
the
old fa
the
l
t
alterna
LOOKING
AROUND
MY
NEIGH
-
borhood
might
lead
one to
conclude
that half
the amateur
operators
in "4-
land"
live here.
On
every block
there is
at least
one 40-
to
60 -foot
tower topped
with
a multi-
element tri -band
beam
an-
tenna or quad.
Given that such
antennas
are
expensive,
and
the mortgage
com-
pany eats
a considerable
portion
of my
budget
every month,
I am noticeably
jealous,
of course.
But
are those
beams
really
necessary?
To
ask a
few of
the top DXers
you
would
think
so, but
amateur
operations
do not depend
on
having such
an
anten-
na.
Some years
ago I knew
an
amateur
who
hailed from
Brooklyn,
and then
moved
to
downtown Washington,
DC.
In both
places,
he lived
in an
apartment
building.
His
antenna
was
a dipole
ex-
cited by the
30 -watt
output of
a Heathkit
DX
-20
transmitter.
With
that little
rig
and "impossible"
antenna
he worked
40
-meter
DXCC
from
both
Brooklyn
and Wash
-
ington...which
proves
that it is
the oper-
ator
not the
equipment
that
makes
the
critical
difference.
(A good
mechanic
never
blames his
or her
tools.)
Sure,
the
little
guy has
to
work
a little
harder,
but
still
can get
good
results...and
become
a lot better
operator
in
the bargain
than
his "blowtorch"
buddy.
Recently
I
resurrected
the
old -fash-
ioned
half-wavelength
dipole
to supple-
ment
my four
-band
trap vertical.
Too
few
amateurs
have
proper
respect
for the
dipole,
and
that's a shame
for
it really
works.
The
dipole
(when
done
right) is
a good performing
antenna,
and it's dirt
cheap...which
makes the
cost/benefit
ratio
tremendous.
The word
dipole means
"two
pole."
The
basic
configuration
is shown
in Fig.
1.
Two quarter-
wavelength
sections
form
the half
-wavelength
radiator.
The
transmission
line is
typically
75 -ohm
coaxial
cable (which
we'll
discuss
later),
and is
applied to the
center point
r
468
L"f
MHz
INSULATOR
75
OHM
COAX
TO
TRANSMITTER
--
Fig.
1 -The
dipole
(meaning
two
pole
") consist
of two
quarter -wave-
length
sections
to form
the half -
wavelength
radiator.
The transmission
line is
typically
75
-ohm coaxial
cable,
which is
applied
to the
center
point between
the two
elements.
The
coax inner
conductor
is
connected
to
one
radiator.
and the
shield is
connected
to the
other radiator.
between
the two
elements.
The
coax
inner
conductor
is
connected
to
one ra-
diator,
and
the shield
is connected
to the
other radiator.
According
to best practice, the ideal
dipole should be installed several wave-
lengths
above ground, and several
wavelengths
from any conducting
ob-
ject. In the real world,
however, that's
seldom
attainable except (possibly) in
the upper
HF bands (i.e., 21 -MHz
and
up). At lower frequencies,
the ideal is
seldom
achievable.
Consider the
40-
meter
band dipole, for
example. Half a
wavelength
is around 66 -feet,
so a full
wavelength
is I32 -feet.
Several
wave-
lengths
is usually taken
to mean five
wavelengths,
so
the ideal 40 -meter
an-
tenna would
be 660 -feet off the
ground,
or 105 -feet higher than
the
Washington
Monument!
Obviously,
a lot of good working
di-
poles
are floating
around the
at-
mosphere
at
anything that
approaches
the correct
(ideal) altitude.
Fortunately,
the ideal need
not be
achieved
in order to make
a good work-
ing
dipole. If the
dipole is only
a half
wavelength
above ground
semi
-ideal
performance
is approximated...not
the
best, but
darn
good.
A
l0- meter, 13-
meter, or
I5 -meter
dipole can
easily
meet
the half -wavelength
high
criteria.
A 15
-meter
dipole need only
be 22 -feet
off the deck
to meet that
criteria.
But
even at less
than a half -wave-
length
high,
the dipole
performs well,
but
with
some
qualifications.
For sev-
eral years
my 40
-meter
dipole (with
which
I
worked
a lot of DX) was
only
15 -feet
off the
ground at the
porch
end
and 26 -feet
off the ground
at the tree
end; when
a friend
managed
to climb
a
couple of
trees for
fat of K4IPV
and
install
a
40
-meter
dipole at
the
40
-foot
level,
I was
in hog heaven.
I bet
that
most
amateur
-radio
dipoles are in-
stalled
in
a situation
(less
than ideal)
such
as illustrated
in
Fig. 2: one
end
attached
to the house
(or in
my case a
porch)
and the other
end attached
to a
tree
or another
building.
There
are
two effects
of installing
a
dipole
at less than
optimum
height.
First,
the pattern
is changed.
The stan-
dard
dipole pattern
(ideal)
is shown
in
Fig.
3A. The
"figure-8" pattern
shows
that the
dipole is
bidirectional,
and as
such, places
the
vast
majority
of the
energy in
the two main
lobes. At
non-
ideal
heights,
the ideal
pattern
degener-
ates into one with
a lot
of sidelobes (see
Fig.
3B).
But for practical
purposes
that's
rarely
a problem,
and indeed
if
there
are points where
you'd
like
to
make contact
in several
directions,
then
it
may actually
be a
benefit.
The
other
defect of less
than ideal
dipoles is
that the feedpoint
impedance
is not
the ideal 72 -ohms.
The
actual
impedance
can
vary
from about 40
to
almost
140
ohms depending
upon the
antenna's
height
above ground.
If the
impedance
causes a
VSWR,
it
will
be
(at most)
72/40 =
1.8:1 in one
direction
or 140:72
=
1.9:1 in the
other. That
VSWR
is
almost not worth
correcting,
but
if necessary,
a coaxial "Q-
section"
or other method
can be
used to over-
come
the
VSWR.
Vue de la page 81
1 2 ... 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 ... 99 100

Commentaires sur ces manuels

Pas de commentaire